I finally finished reading Parasite Rex a few days ago. It was an amazing book, and if you haven't read it already, you should! As I started thinking about what to write about for today's post, I started reflecting on the last chapter of the book. I also started thinking about why I am so intrigued by parasites and why so many other people find them disgusting. So, I decided that rather than talk about a specific parasite today, I would blog about how I came to be a lover of things that many people consider "repulsive".
To further preface this post, I've been living at a biological field station for a little over a week. I'll be working here all summer doing various odd jobs and being a teaching assistant for summer sessions. In addition to being a parasitophile, I'm also an araneophile (lover of spiders). I started collecting a few spiders after arriving here just for funzies, but now I've fallen into working on building a permanent spider collection for the station since we don't already have one here. Over the course of four or five days, I've already collected 30 specimens representing at least 6 different families as far as I can tell. I will be ordering a spider identification manual soon so that we can officially identify what I've collected so far. Like parasites, spiders are creatures of great beauty, complexity, and diversity that are vastly under-appreciated by the general public.
What is it with me and liking creatures most people are disgusted by or avidly afraid of? I pondered this question for a very long time last night as the thought of getting a spider tattoo crossed my mind. Why a spider tattoo? Because it would be more than simply a thing I found interesting, it would be highly symbolic of my growth as a scientist. You see, I haven't always loved spiders...in fact, most of my life I was very much an arachnophobe. I would squeal and stomp just like any girl would do despite being surrounded by them the majority of my childhood growing up on a farm. I was also afraid of snakes and some of the more threatening flying insects like wasps and muddobbers. I wasn't so keen on ants either. But things change as we grow older, and more importantly wiser.
As a young biologist, I took a class in vertebrate zoology that made me decide I wanted to become a herpetologist (one who studies reptiles and amphibians). I loved frogs and lizards and was even developing a fondness for turtles. Then there were snakes. Most people who long to be herpetologists love snakes...I was the opposite. Snakes were the last creatures I wanted to study, but I knew that they sort of came with the territory if I wanted to be a herpetologist. So I set out to change my fear of snakes into at the very least a mild tolerance. I tried to handle them every chance that I got and I read up on how they worked and how to handle them safely. In my quest for better understanding, I soon realized that many snakes were completely harmless to us humans. I even started seeing some of these as "cute"...a word I never would have used to describe a snake in the years prior to college. It wasn't long before snakes no longer frightened me, though I have a healthy respect for venomous ones like diamond backs (Crotalus atrox).
Later in my career I became a graduate student. In working towards a general biology degree, I wanted to take all of the "-ology" classes I didn't get to take as an undergrad. I filled my time with mammalogy (study of mammals), araneology (study of spiders), mycology (study of fungi), and entomology (study of insects). I was delighted to take entomology because I wanted to learn more about butterflies and beetles...and I did. I also learned about the dreaded wasps, bees, and ants that I had admittedly trembled in fear of before. (I recall even locking myself in a bathroom until my now-husband came home to rescue me once because a wasp found its way into our home.) But I wasn't about to let these little devils stand between me and getting an "A" on my insect collection. I learned more about these terrifying creatures and I forced myself to capture some of them (though I also conned some of my friends into doing my dirty work). As I became more knowledgeable about the complexity, diversity, and downright coolness of these creatures, my fears slowly evaporated into non-existence. By the end of it, I was no longer afraid to approach nests of these little beasts.
Feeling confident about my ability to work with virtually any type of insect and feeling unburdened by the shackles of my former fear was intoxicating. I didn't want to be afraid of anything that nature could throw at me anymore. I had truly learned that knowledge is power. Understanding something made it less scary...and the next natural step after conquering one's fear is starting to see the beauty in the biology of such magnificent creatures. So I decided to step it up...I registered to take a class about spiders. For an entire semester, I focused on learning about these creepy crawlers. Just as with the metamorphosis I underwent with insects, I slowly began to shift my perspectives about spiders. They weren't the things of nightmares...they were animals with fascinating behaviors, intricate physiology, and astounding beauty once you could appreciate them. I came to call some of these "adorable" like the jumping spiders with iridescent chelicerae or the happy face of a crab spider. Talk about a giant leap towards conquering my fears!
This was my most miraculous change and the experiences of that semester really started to shape how I saw both the natural world and how I viewed society in general. These lessons made me realize that some of the most beautiful things are things you have to want to understand and you have to take the time to really get to know before you can appreciate the amazing insights they have to offer. This applies to people as well. I won't go too deep into my sociopolitical views as you aren't here to read about those viewpoints...but I will say that understanding diversity in nature really shifts the way we see diversity amongst human populations. We start to see that people who are different from us have a place and a purpose in our society. We start to understand that if everyone was the same, our societal ecosystem would be dull and also...more importantly...would not be healthy. We need diversity in society just as any ecosystem needs more than one type of flower or more than one species of insect. Diversity keeps things interesting, beautiful, vibrant, and healthy. Diversity = Progress from a human societal perspective as well as from a biological perspective.
By this time in my career I had discovered the sweet love that dare not speak its name...no, I'm not a lesbian...I'm talking about becoming a parasitophiliac. The world doesn't always see parasites in the best of light...in fact, the opposite is more often true. However, I had begun to see the beauty in another group of creatures most people found disturbing and even disgusting. I had fallen for stories of bizarre life cycles and unimaginable diversity. Things that once seemed like creatures that rarely inundated hosts and caused problems for people and other animals started to seem much more ubiquitous and subsequently much more vital to a healthy ecosystem. I started to learn that parasitism was an extremely common and successful way of life for a plethora of invertebrate creatures. They lived in things, on things, and around things. They seemed to be interwoven into every aspect of biology...genetics, immunology, ecology, you name it! Being a parasitologist was more than understanding a single phylum or class of animals...it was about understanding biological principles in a broad sense as well as understanding specifics of whatever creature you specialized in working with.
These creatures really do have a hand in every biological jar. One of the most fascinating aspects of parasitology is the insane intricacy of parasite evolution. Parasites have been the driving force of adaptation in more species than I can count. They have been the culprits behind many of the evolutionary arms races amongst a wide variety of host species. As they become better at evading the immune systems of their hosts, hosts develop better means for detecting the presence of parasites and back and forth the battle rages. They affect more than animal immune systems. In many instances they affect animal morphologies, physiological processes, and even host behaviors. Many parasites are master of host manipulation and behavioral modification. They have developed an arsenal of clever ways to transfer themselves from one host to another. I think Carl Zimmer put it best in Parasite Rex when he said, "When it comes to the tapestry of life, parasites are the hand on the loom." How elegantly beautiful is that?
With such fascinating life styles, I don't understand how any knowledgeable person could not be fascinated or at the very least intrigued by natures most "terrifying" creatures. From snakes, to wasps, to spiders and parasites...nature has shown me that choosing to stay fearful and ignorant keep you from ever seeing some of the really interesting and amazing things she has to offer. Things that most people fear in nature or know very little about are often some of her best works of art. Her underground gallery is rife with stories and images that would evoke the most profound emotions and senses of wonder if only more people would take the time to find the exhibitions. This is why I'm so passionate about the "disgusting"...this is why I love spiders and parasites. Call me a biological hipster (the only form of "hipster" that I wouldn't punch someone in the face for calling me) but having access to mother nature's underground gallery makes me feel privy to the exclusive works of art that we all, in reality, possess the potential to see for ourselves in we just take the time to look.
Sunday, May 12, 2013
Sunday, May 5, 2013
Dermatobia hominis: The Human Skin Bot
![]() |
| D. hominis larva |
Taxonomy
As you probably already know, flies are animals belonging in phylum Arthropoda under the class Insecta. All flies belong to the order Diptera, meaning "two-wing"; this is in reference to the fact that these insects have only one pair of wings as opposed to two pairs like most other insects. The second pair of wings in most flies have been reduced to vestigial structures called "halteres". These structures now function mostly as balancing organs and have a knob-like appearance. This order houses about 120,000 species representing 140 families. The family that contains bot flies is the family Oestridae. This family is split into four subfamilies: Cuterebrinae (skin bot flies), Oestrinae (head maggots), Hypodermatinae (cattle grubs, ox warbles, and heel flies), and Gasterophilinae (stomach bots flies infecting horses and their relatives, elephants, and rhinos). Our D. hominis is found in subfamily Cuterebrinae and is common from Southeast Mexico down through the South American continent, extending to Argentina and Chile. Though we call it the "human skin bot", it will actually develop beneath the skin of just about any warm-blooded animal...mammals or even birds.
![]() |
| Adult human skin bot fly |
The life cycle of this fly is similar to other flies in that it involves the laying of an egg what will hatch into a larva, which will go on to form a pupa from which an adult fly will eventually emerge. Unlike most flies that infect their hosts (a condition known as "myiasis" which we will discuss in a moment), this fly does not lay eggs directly onto their hosts' bodies. Nope, these guys are much more devious. An adult female fly will catch another parasitic insect, like maybe a mosquito, and glue her eggs onto the insect's body with the opercula (little flaps that open to release the eggs' contents) of the eggs facing downward. It is unknown how many different types of insect carries are used by D. hominis, but there are at least 48 different types of flies and on tick species that have been known to be carriers. Once one of these carriers lands on warm skin, the opercula open releasing the larvae onto their new hosts. The larvae then burrow into unbroken skin and make a home in the dermal layers of the skin, where they stay for about 6 weeks before burrowing out of the skin and falling into the soil where they form a pupa and undergo metamorphosis, emerging as adult flies ready to mate and restart the cycle.
Myiasis
![]() |
| Bot fly larva being removed from a leg |
![]() |
| Human skin bot fly larva |
Treatment
No matter how awesome it is that these guys make antibacterials from their spit, they are not fun to have burrowing into your dermis. The best way to remove a bot fly larva from yourself is to suffocate the little guy and then pull him out by squeezing or using tweezers. There are several ways to suffocate the larva. One way is to put tape over the wound, but this is not recommended as it can actually rip the larva causing problems with total removal. Another, less damaging way is to apply several coats of nail polish to the wound, but this can be problematic when removing the nail polish and is easily applied incorrectly due to the nature of skin. The best, most effective way with the easiest cleanup is to apply a generous coating of petroleum jelly to the wound. Which ever method you use, leave the applied substance on the wound for about a day or more, then you can remove the substance and subsequently remove the fly. Some sources say that a venom extractor (found in snake-bite first aid kits) can be very effective at removing these larvae.
Moral of the Story
![]() |
| I think if you get a bot fly, someone should buy you this shirt. |
Sunday, April 28, 2013
Meet the Crimson Rambler
When I was a child, my mother...like many other mothers...used to say, "Good night. Sleep tight. Don't let the bed bugs bite!". Good advice for a child not sure what
bed bugs really were...otherwise I'd probably have had nightmares! I
spent most of my young life thinking bed bugs were mythical because of
that phrase. As I got older, I discovered that they were very real
creatures that actually do bite people as they sleep. As you can imagine, I was filled with fear and panic when I first learned about how pesky these little buggers can be. As I've grown into the young parasitologist that I am, these pests have moved from something I fear to something I find fascinating. Like most other parasites, these guys have very interesting lives and guess what...they aren't terribly dangerous to tell the truth. The worst they can do is be an annoyance and an extremely difficult one to rid yourself of at that. So, today we look at the strange lives of these odd insects that have had aliases such as the "wall louse", "heavy dragon", "chinche bug", "redcoat", and my personal favorite, "crimson rambler". Taxonomy
These animals belong to the largest of all the animal phyla: Phylum Arthropoda. Within this phylum they exist as members of class Insecta. Something tells me you can guess what other types of creatures make up this class. They belong to order Hemiptera, meaning "half-wing", which refers to the partially membranous wings of most member of this order. Interestingly enough, not all members of this order have wings (as we see with bed bugs). However, members of this order do all possess piercing-sucking mouthparts often called the proboscis. This is used for penetrating tissues..both animal and plant in nature. They further belong to family Cimicidae. Members of this family are all wingless blood-feeders that seek out birds, bats, and humans. There are 22 genera within this family; twelve feed on bats, two on humans, and the rest on birds...typically birds that live in caves or along cliffs. The three species that feed on humans are colloquially called "bed bugs" due to their nocturnal feeding habits. These three are Cimex lectularius, Cimex hemipterus, and Leptocimex boueti. The first is the most commonly found species globally, but prefers temperate climates, while the second prefers more tropical areas. The last is found only in West Africa.
Bed Bug Bodies
![]() |
| SEM of a bed bug. The piercing mouthparts have been artificially colored with purple and red. |
Coming Out of the Woodwork...Err...Cave-work?!
These insects can proliferate quickly and be extremely difficult to eradicate once they have an established home. But where did they originally come from? Though no one can say for sure when or where bed bugs originated, we do know that the three species that feed on humans are also known to feed on bats. It is likely that humans picked up these parasites from living in caves alongside infested bat colonies. C. lectularius has also been known to feed on rodents, which may have helped to spread these insects into human dwellings outside of caves.
There is a long and fascinating history associated with these little bugs, but I'll save that for a future post. Today, we are experiencing a time of resurgence in bed bug populations. As more people take over the planet, we build more places to house more people in fewer areas. This space-saving comes with a price. Not only are apartments, dorms, and condos more prone to infestations with cockroaches and ants, now we are seeing more and more cases of bed bug infestations as well. As you probably would have guessed, they are a bigger problem in places with larger populations.
The Feeding: Adventures of the Crimson Rambler
After closing your eyes and drifting off to dreamland, these little creatures make their way out of mattresses, dressers, pillows, and cracks or crevices in the walls near your bed. They find their way to you by detecting the carbon dioxide you exhale with every breath, by feeling the warmth of your body heat as they get closer, and by using a variety of navigation chemicals.
After discovering your exposed skin, the creatures pierce you with their tiny little beaks. This blood derrick finally strikes paydirt when it enters into a blood vessel. From here, the pressure within the vessel itself forces this iron-rich liquid into the body of this miniscule beast. Their bites are not painful and often go unnoticed in the beginning. The wounds left behind eventually become small itchy welts around your neck, arms, and jaw. The bug draws on the fresh blood for the next 5-10 minutes before dropping off and crawling back into the home from which they emerged. This is a ritual that occurs every 5-10 days.
Despite the fact that these creatures tend to feed once or twice a week, they can actually go for about 5 months without feeding under typical conditions. Under ideal conditions (for them) they can live for up to a year. Speaking of time, here's a fun fact: These insects digest their blood meals slowly and human DNA can be recovered from bed bugs up to 90 days post feeding! This gives them a unique place in forensic entomology for determining whether or not a person was in a place where the bed bugs were found!
![]() |
| Male (behind) traumatically inseminating a female. |
One of the things that I've always found most fascinating about bed bugs is their means of reproduction. These animals mate when a male finds a female, grabs her from behind, and literally stabs her in the abdomen with his hypodermic genitalia. That's right hypodermic genitals. After the stabbing, he ejaculates into her body and the sperm swim around in her hemolymph until they reach sperm storage structures. Eventually, the sperm are released and move to the ovaries where fertilization occurs. This process is appropriately called traumatic insemination.
Human Health Issues
![]() |
| Bed bug welts. |
These bugs are often associated with sub-par living spaces in our minds, but the truth is that a home can be a very nice home and still get an infestation. They can be brought into a home through clothing, luggage, furniture, etc. from an infested home. They can also come from wild animals or pets that have been exposed to nesting sites.
Detection and Management
Bed bugs are not always easy to detect because they are nocturnal feeders, usually feeding in the wee hours of the morning. If you haven't had any reactions to the bites, you can still detect bed bugs by finding their fecal spots, blood smears on your bedding, or empty exoskeletons left behind as the insects molt.
![]() |
| A bed bug harborage. |
Some people employ the help of specially trained bed bug detection dogs to help them find harborages. Apparently, these dogs are very good at their jobs. Under controlled lab conditions, these dogs are 97.5% accurate. Of course, we expect that rate to be lower under real-world conditions, but that's still pretty impressive! Bed bugs are said to have a smell that some describe as rotting raspberries. Trained dogs can typically pick up on the origins of these smells within minutes, which pest control specialists usually need about an hour.
![]() |
| A New York bed bug detection dog. |
Bed bugs die if exposed to 115°F heat for 7 minutes or more. Heat along with pesticides like malathion are the best course of action for managing bed bug infestations. These animals can also be killed by freezing temperatures, but this takes several days rather than a matter of minutes. It is also recommended to vacuum areas, heat treat bedding and mattresses, and above all else to call in professionals to help with eradication efforts. In extreme cases, you may have to dispose of a heavily infested mattress or couch.
There was an interesting paper that came out recently talking about a traditional method of bed bug control that involved the use of plant leaves scattered around the bed as traps. Apparently this method actually works to some degree and scientists are working to develop artificial traps that have the same design as the hairs on these bed bug-snaring leaves. More about that paper in a future post.
![]() |
| Bed bugs and their eggs inside an infested dresser drawer. |
If you do develop skin problems from bites, you can treat them using a hydrocortisone cream or an oral antihistamine like Benedryl. The bites usually heal within a few weeks.
Moral of the Story
If you get bed bugs, be sad that you have something hard to get rid of, but happy that you have something that can't transmit any sort of deadly disease! (Always a silver lining!) These creatures are fascinating even though they cause a lot of human annoyance and can be costly to eradicate from your home. Be in awe of the crimson ramblers...just hope you never have to deal with them up-close and personal! :p
Sunday, April 21, 2013
Avian Trichomoniasis: A Disease that is for the Birds
Last night I got home from the 46th annual Southwestern Association of Parasitologists' meeting. I spent Thursday night, all day Friday, and Saturday morning immersed in conversations about parasitism among other exciting topics. My little notebook is clutter with little thoughts that popped up during the numerous and exciting presentations given by everyone from undergraduates through tenured professors. When I sat down to create a post for today, I had a hard time deciding which topic to pick! Then I remembered that I will be able to post on everything I learned in good time. One thing that was barely touched upon sparked my interest. Rather than posting about something I learned a lot about (you know, the logical thing to do) I decided to post about something I had to do a little research about. This wasn't the first time I've ever encountered Trichomonas gallinae, in fact, I mentioned it once in a blog about dinosaur parasites. But I've never written anything else about it, and I would like to change that. So, here it is, a blog post about something that was barely mentioned and scarcely discussed at a meeting full of parasitophiliacs, just because I can.
Trichomonas gallinae is not a human parasite. This parasite instead infects a variety of birds. It is most often found in columbids (doves and pigeons) but has also been known to infect chickens (no wonder with an epithet like "gallinae"...the scientific name for a chicken is Gallus gallus), turkeys (which are in the same order as chickens...the order galliformes), and a variety of raptors (birds of prey like hawks and eagles). As late as 2005, reports of the disease were coming out about new bird host species. The disease is widespread and, as you may have already guessed, very much not host-specific. But before we go any further, let us look at this protist's taxonomic status.
Taxonomy
Like all protists, this organism is a eukaryote, separate from bacteria and archaea by the presence of true, membrane-bound organelles. There are many debates about upper taxonomy, so to avoid doling out information that is not up to date, let us skip to the class level. This organism is placed within class Parabasalia, which is thought to be one of the oldest classes of protozoans. These primitive, unicellular organisms lack mitochondria and function anaerobically. Parabasalids are characterized by the presence of one or more clusters of flagella emerging from the anterior end of the cell. They are named for the parabasal fibers that run between basal bodies and Golgi complexes within the cell There are 10 orders within this class, most of which are known to live within the guts of insects (both as parasites and as symbiotic mutualists). They are further placed within the order Trichomonadida based on their morphological characters. Member of this order usually have 4-6 flagella with one being "recurrent", meaning that one runs the length of the cell and presents much like an undulating membrane. Those within this group that are parasites (and not all of them are) never form a cyst stage. Instead they remain in mobile feeding stages known as "trophozoites". Because they do not usually form a cyst stage, the major means of transmission is via direct contact. This protist belongs in the family Trichomonadidae under the type genus Trichomonas. Members of this genus exclusively parasitize vertebrates, but non-parasitic members can be found as endosymbionts within the guts of termites. One member of this genus, T. vaginalis, parasitizes humans and is spread through sexual contact.
Life Cycle
Trichomonas gallinae has a relatively simple life cycle compared to say, most parasitic helminths. But that doesn't make it uninteresting. These parasites are typically found at the anterior ends of the digestive and respiratory tracts of birds or in the oral-nasal cavity of such animals. These organisms are able to reproduce quickly via binary fission while inside a suitable host. Again, these organisms do not form cysts, so they often die rather soon after expulsion from a host. They move from one host to another in one of three ways:
1) As a parent bird regurgitates food or crop milk (a secretion produced by pigeons, doves, flamingos, and some penguins that includes partial sloughs of the lining from the crop and contains a great deal of protein, fats, anti-oxidants, and immune supplements including antibodies and digestive bacteria) to feed their young, the parasite can get picked up as the food passes through the upper digestive tract and/or oral cavity and transferred to the young upon ingestion. This is the main source of transmission among doves and pigeons, which could be why the parasite is so prevalent in these types of birds. Adult birds may carry the disease asymptomatically for years...spreading the disease to their offspring long before manifesting clinical signs of infection.
2) Trophozoites can survive for a short time in water, where an uninfected host may pick up the parasite through drinking. This means of transmission is highly problematic for domesticated chickens and turkeys that drink from water or ingest food that may be contaminated with feces, saliva, or a variety of secretions coming from the crop. Wild birds have been known as sources of infection among domestic birds, but domestic birds keep the transmission cycle going within their own flocks through this form of transmission.
3) An uninfected bird may eat an infected bird and acquire the infection in this manner. This is an especially common means of infection for birds of prey, for reasons I'm sure you can imagine.
Avian Trichomoniasis
This disease is typically found in young birds and can be found in a wide variety of virulence patterns. Adult birds that have been infected and have recovered carry the parasite, but become resistant to reinfection. Because of the dynamic virulence of these parasites, the rates of birds infected are not closely linked to mortality rates. Sometimes infections are mild or even asymptomatic for years. Other times, the disease can result in death a mere 4-18 days after infection.
The disease presents as lesions within the mouth cavity that appear white or light yellow. The lesions result in mucosal inflammation and ulcerations that expand into the esophagus, proventriculus, and crop. As the disease progresses, the lesions create masses of dead (necrotic) tissue that may block the passage of food and/or air. This may cause so much pain that the birds no longer wants to eat and suffers from subsequent starvation, or it may cause emaciation or asphyxiation as the esophagus and trachea become obstructed. In rare instances, other organs such as the liver, or the eyes can become infected and will manifest such lesions to cause organ failure.
Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prevention
Avian trichomoniasis may be diagnosed based on clinical signs such as difficulty swallowing, inflamed mucosa, and excessive salivation or by direct observation of characteristic lesions/nodules within the mouth. The only way to confirm infection is to demonstrate the organisms microscopically from samples of fluids, nodules, or lesions.

The most efficient treatment is the administration of antiprotozoal drugs like dimetridazole or metronidazole. Birds typically recover in as little as 1-2 days after administering such drugs. Sometimes, oral plaques have to be removed manually using forceps before drug administration.
For domesticated birds, the best form of prevention is regular cleanings of feeders and water sources. It is also important to try to reduce contact with wild birds that may transmit the disease or at the very least protect food and water sources from wild birds.
The spread among wild birds can be reduced by regularly cleaning wild bird feeders and bird baths, allowing adequate drying time for both before refilling them with food or water. These parasites have never been known to infect humans, but in the interest of safety from other type of avian zoonoses, it's a good idea to wear gloves when completing such chores.
Moral of the Story
First of all, writing this post taught me that just because something is grazed over at a meeting of people who love parasites doesn't make it any less significant or interesting than any other parasite. From doing the actual research itself, it is important to know about such things if you ever plan to raise domestic birds as pets or sources of meat/eggs/feathers. It is equally important to know these things if you are a wild bird enthusiast with a backyard of bird feeders and stone baths for inviting your winged friends to join you for a mint julep on a nice, sunny afternoon. So, keep your bird-areas clean as best you can and hope for mild cases for the birds beyond your treatment/prevention capabilities.
Trichomonas gallinae is not a human parasite. This parasite instead infects a variety of birds. It is most often found in columbids (doves and pigeons) but has also been known to infect chickens (no wonder with an epithet like "gallinae"...the scientific name for a chicken is Gallus gallus), turkeys (which are in the same order as chickens...the order galliformes), and a variety of raptors (birds of prey like hawks and eagles). As late as 2005, reports of the disease were coming out about new bird host species. The disease is widespread and, as you may have already guessed, very much not host-specific. But before we go any further, let us look at this protist's taxonomic status.Taxonomy
Like all protists, this organism is a eukaryote, separate from bacteria and archaea by the presence of true, membrane-bound organelles. There are many debates about upper taxonomy, so to avoid doling out information that is not up to date, let us skip to the class level. This organism is placed within class Parabasalia, which is thought to be one of the oldest classes of protozoans. These primitive, unicellular organisms lack mitochondria and function anaerobically. Parabasalids are characterized by the presence of one or more clusters of flagella emerging from the anterior end of the cell. They are named for the parabasal fibers that run between basal bodies and Golgi complexes within the cell There are 10 orders within this class, most of which are known to live within the guts of insects (both as parasites and as symbiotic mutualists). They are further placed within the order Trichomonadida based on their morphological characters. Member of this order usually have 4-6 flagella with one being "recurrent", meaning that one runs the length of the cell and presents much like an undulating membrane. Those within this group that are parasites (and not all of them are) never form a cyst stage. Instead they remain in mobile feeding stages known as "trophozoites". Because they do not usually form a cyst stage, the major means of transmission is via direct contact. This protist belongs in the family Trichomonadidae under the type genus Trichomonas. Members of this genus exclusively parasitize vertebrates, but non-parasitic members can be found as endosymbionts within the guts of termites. One member of this genus, T. vaginalis, parasitizes humans and is spread through sexual contact.
Life Cycle
Trichomonas gallinae has a relatively simple life cycle compared to say, most parasitic helminths. But that doesn't make it uninteresting. These parasites are typically found at the anterior ends of the digestive and respiratory tracts of birds or in the oral-nasal cavity of such animals. These organisms are able to reproduce quickly via binary fission while inside a suitable host. Again, these organisms do not form cysts, so they often die rather soon after expulsion from a host. They move from one host to another in one of three ways:
1) As a parent bird regurgitates food or crop milk (a secretion produced by pigeons, doves, flamingos, and some penguins that includes partial sloughs of the lining from the crop and contains a great deal of protein, fats, anti-oxidants, and immune supplements including antibodies and digestive bacteria) to feed their young, the parasite can get picked up as the food passes through the upper digestive tract and/or oral cavity and transferred to the young upon ingestion. This is the main source of transmission among doves and pigeons, which could be why the parasite is so prevalent in these types of birds. Adult birds may carry the disease asymptomatically for years...spreading the disease to their offspring long before manifesting clinical signs of infection.
2) Trophozoites can survive for a short time in water, where an uninfected host may pick up the parasite through drinking. This means of transmission is highly problematic for domesticated chickens and turkeys that drink from water or ingest food that may be contaminated with feces, saliva, or a variety of secretions coming from the crop. Wild birds have been known as sources of infection among domestic birds, but domestic birds keep the transmission cycle going within their own flocks through this form of transmission.
3) An uninfected bird may eat an infected bird and acquire the infection in this manner. This is an especially common means of infection for birds of prey, for reasons I'm sure you can imagine.
Avian Trichomoniasis
This disease is typically found in young birds and can be found in a wide variety of virulence patterns. Adult birds that have been infected and have recovered carry the parasite, but become resistant to reinfection. Because of the dynamic virulence of these parasites, the rates of birds infected are not closely linked to mortality rates. Sometimes infections are mild or even asymptomatic for years. Other times, the disease can result in death a mere 4-18 days after infection.
The disease presents as lesions within the mouth cavity that appear white or light yellow. The lesions result in mucosal inflammation and ulcerations that expand into the esophagus, proventriculus, and crop. As the disease progresses, the lesions create masses of dead (necrotic) tissue that may block the passage of food and/or air. This may cause so much pain that the birds no longer wants to eat and suffers from subsequent starvation, or it may cause emaciation or asphyxiation as the esophagus and trachea become obstructed. In rare instances, other organs such as the liver, or the eyes can become infected and will manifest such lesions to cause organ failure.
Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prevention
Avian trichomoniasis may be diagnosed based on clinical signs such as difficulty swallowing, inflamed mucosa, and excessive salivation or by direct observation of characteristic lesions/nodules within the mouth. The only way to confirm infection is to demonstrate the organisms microscopically from samples of fluids, nodules, or lesions.

The most efficient treatment is the administration of antiprotozoal drugs like dimetridazole or metronidazole. Birds typically recover in as little as 1-2 days after administering such drugs. Sometimes, oral plaques have to be removed manually using forceps before drug administration.
For domesticated birds, the best form of prevention is regular cleanings of feeders and water sources. It is also important to try to reduce contact with wild birds that may transmit the disease or at the very least protect food and water sources from wild birds.
The spread among wild birds can be reduced by regularly cleaning wild bird feeders and bird baths, allowing adequate drying time for both before refilling them with food or water. These parasites have never been known to infect humans, but in the interest of safety from other type of avian zoonoses, it's a good idea to wear gloves when completing such chores.
Moral of the Story
First of all, writing this post taught me that just because something is grazed over at a meeting of people who love parasites doesn't make it any less significant or interesting than any other parasite. From doing the actual research itself, it is important to know about such things if you ever plan to raise domestic birds as pets or sources of meat/eggs/feathers. It is equally important to know these things if you are a wild bird enthusiast with a backyard of bird feeders and stone baths for inviting your winged friends to join you for a mint julep on a nice, sunny afternoon. So, keep your bird-areas clean as best you can and hope for mild cases for the birds beyond your treatment/prevention capabilities.
Sunday, April 14, 2013
Long Live the Broad Fish Tapeworm! All About Diphyllobothrium latum

You may or may not be aware that eating certain foods puts you at risk of picking up parasites such as Diphyllobothrium latum. Don't worry, I'm not going to try to talk you out of eating sushi or ceviche...I would never do that because I am a lover of both! However, it is good to be aware of the dangers of such foods so that you know what you are getting yourself into...especially in places other than the states where regulations are...less stringent, to put it mildly. The bad news is that this parasite can go undetected for many years, and may get to be about 30 feet long in humans. The good news is that once you've been diagnosed, our old friend Praziquantel can knock out in infection rather quickly. So sit back, and enjoy learning about this fascinating fish tapeworm!
So what is this parasite you speak of?
![]() |
| Sushi from a restaurant in Chicago...I ate most of this! |
![]() |
| Carpaccio di Persico |
![]() |
| Ceviche |
Like all tapeworms, this animals belongs to phylum platyhelminthes under class Cestoda. It further belongs to order Pseudophyllida because the adults of this species possess two bothria (structures that help them attach to the host's intestinal walls) and dumbbell-shaped ovaries. These worms also have both the genital pore and the uterine pore located in the center of their ventral (belly) sides. D. latum belongs in family Diphyllobothriidae, which infect copepods, then later infect fish (usually), and wind up in mammals, where they grow to maturity and reproduce. D. latum is the longest tapeworm species that infects humans, averaging 10 meters (30 feet) in length. These worms may shed as many as one million eggs in a day. The proglottids (segments in which eggs are produced...among other functions) of this worm are more broad than other tapeworm proglottids, hence the common name.
![]() |
| Scolex showing bothria on left. Proglottids on right. |
The life cycle of this tapeworm starts with an infected mammal shedding proglottids (laden with eggs) in their feces. These proglottids get ingested by a copepod (this takes place in water) and the eggs develop into a procercoid larva. A small fish, such as a minnow, then eats the infected copepod and the parasite develops into a plerocercoid larva or "sparganum" within the fish's muscles. Along comes a bigger fish that eats the smaller fish, and now the parasite can make a comfy home in the muscles of something like a trout or perch. An unsuspecting human then eats the fish without properly cooking it to rid it of the parasites within, and now our human is infected. Once inside the human, the parasites become immature adults and eventually develop into sexually mature adults. They begin to reproduce, releasing their eggs in the human's feces and the cycle begins again. These worms are restricted to humans, in fact many other animals have been reported to have harbored these worms. There are papers describing this worm from dogs, cats, bears, weasels, and even pinnipeds (such as seals and sea lions)! Once established in a mammal host, this worm can live for up to 20 years, sometimes going completely unnoticed!
Diphyllobothriasis
The disease associated with being infected with D. latum has a long history with coastal cultures that have traditionally created foods using raw or undercooked fish. Archaeological sites in South America have revealed eggs in 4,000-10,000 year old human remains. During the 1970s, there were over 5 million cases of diphyllobothriasis reported in Europe and over 4 million cases reported in Asia. Symptoms of this disease are often asymptomatic (having no clinical signs or symptoms), in fact, 4 out of every 5 people who contract this worm show no signs of infection. The remaining 1 in 5 infected persons experiences vomiting, diarrhea, and weight loss in addition to fatigue, abdominal pain, general discomfort, and constipation. In prolonged cases, patients rarely suffer from severe vitamin B-12 deficiency as this parasite may absorb as much as 80% of B-12 within a person's body. This deficiency can lead to megaloblastic anemia, which leads to demyelination (loss of the insulation around your nerves). Demyelination leads to degeneration of the spinal cord
and may leave people with a variety of disfunctional nerve-related symptoms.
Diagnosis and Treatment
![]() |
| D. latum egg under a microscope. |
Prevention
One way to prevent the spread of diphyllobothriasis is to raise public awareness of water contamination and to encourage them not to defecate in sources of drinking water. One should always avoid eating any fish that looks questionable. The best way to prevent the spread of this disease is to educate food handlers about how to properly prepare fish. Fish should either be cooked thoroughly or brined before serving. If a dish requires raw fish, the fish should be frozen at -10 degrees C for 2-3 days before being thawed and used.
![]() |
| Gefilte Fish |
If you are planning to eat sushi or gefilte fish, be sure the fish have been prepared properly to kill off any little passengers that may have been hanging out in the fish muscles. If you think you may have accidentally ingested a fish tapeworm, see a doctor so that you don't carry around your new friend for a few decades. Also, don't be mad at D. latum, remember, he/she is just trying to survive! And by the way, sushi is still delicious, so the risk of getting an easily treatable tapeworm infection is certainly not going to keep me from enjoying it! :P
![]() |
| See? We LOVE sushi!!! :p |
![]() |
| Here's a close-up of the sushi bridge we ordered! :) |
Saturday, April 6, 2013
A Love Letter About My First Parasite Encounter: Meet Ascaris lumbricoides
![]() |
| Okay, so this person has green gloves, but the purple are much more memorable to me! |
![]() |
| A pinned dissection of a female Ascaris. |
This morning I was thinking about what to post for this week, and I realized that I had never posted anything about this creature, which in all fairness was the first creature to spark my interest in parasites. So let's talk about it!
Not long ago, I learned that this worm has a common name...which I had never heard before, surprisingly. It is known in other places, especially in Europe, as "the maw-worm". The word "maw" has deep roots dating back to both the Old English "maga"and the Middle English "mawe" both referring to the stomach or the belly. Today, the word is more often used to describe the upper digestive tract, especially the mouth of a particularly ravenous animal. As we discuss the life cycle of this animal, keep both definitions in mind. But first things first.
Taxonomy
Ascaris lumbricoides belongs to kingdom Animalia and to phylum Nematoda (roundworms). As roundworms, they lack circulatory and respiratory systems and have a cuticle that is shed during successive growth stages. This last characteristic is why these animals are thought to be more closely related to arthropods than to flatworms or segmented worms. This species is further classified under the class Rhabditea along with other parasitic nematodes such as threadworms and pinworms. They exist in the order Ascaridida on the basis of having three prominent lips, lots of cuticular sensory structures called caudal papillae, and lateral external labial papillae. These worms are placed in the family Ascarididae, which it shares with the famous dog parasite, Toxocara canis.
Morphology
![]() |
| Posterior end of a male A. lumbricoides. |
The eggs of these animals are particularly fascinating. They can be oval or round and appear to have a bumpy outer shell. This bumpy layer is comprised of proteins and is referred to as being "mammillated", which is really just a fancy word for bumpy. The lipids in the layer beneath the proteins in the egg shell are largely ascarosides. Ascarosides are glycosides (sugars + alcohol + glycosidic bond) which give the shell its incredible powers of impenetrability. The only things that can pass through such layers are gases and lipid solvents. This gives them a resistance to a variety of chemicals that one parasite text book referred to as "almost legendary". These eggs have been known to remain viable in formalin, potassium dichromate, hydrochloric acid, nitric acid, acetic acid, and even sulfuric acid. (*Note* The acids were at 50% solutions, not at full strength, but that's still pretty amazing!) There have been documented cases of these eggs remaining viable after 10-12 years in the environment. The eggs are sometimes carried accidentally by cockroaches and other household pests that may dwell in contaminated soils. (Another reason I hate cockroaches.)Life Cycle
The life cycle of these worms starts with their impervious eggs being shed in the feces of a human (or pig) host into soil. While in the environment, juvenile worms will begin to form inside of the protective egg shells of fertilized eggs. The juveniles will undergo a series of life stages, all inside the egg, before the egg becomes infective. At this point, a person (or pig) eats fruits or vegetables that are contaminated with egg-laden soil or drinks water with similar contamination. Sometimes the eggs can even become airborne under the right conditions and infect via the nasal passages of humans. The eggs travel down into the stomach, where they continue to be impervious to the acids of the stomach, and on into the small intestines. The eggs then hatch releasing the juvenile worms who then penetrate the intestinal walls to hitch a ride in the hepatic portal system. The now fourth-stage worms reach the lungs and penetrate through the alveoli. They move up through the bronchiole tubes and into the trachea before being coughed up and re-swallowed back down into the esophagus. Once back in the small intestine, the worms mature, mate, and start pumping out eggs to start the cycle over.
The question I have, which is a question other more experienced biologists still trying to answer, is why the long journey out of the small intestine only to wind back up in the same place? Why not just stay there and mature in a safer environment? Some think this odd behavior is something that is a relic of some evolutionary adaptation with origins much further back in time. It makes me think of a sort of parasite walk-about. Where juveniles must embark on a perilous journey through our bodies in order to prove they have the ability to survive our dangerous immune system. Upon returning home, they are given the privilege of mating and passing on their superior genes to the next generation of survivalists. (I feel like I could make a cartoon out of this...)
Ascariasis
![]() |
| A view of Ascaris within a small intestine. |
![]() |
| A removed section of intestine that was cut open to reveal blockage by these worms. |
Diagnosis
Currently, there's no good way to identify juvenile stages of this parasite within a patient's body. Juveniles can be identified from sputum, but only by technicians who recognize them as being such. Fecal examinations can reveal eggs after worms have reached maturity and begun laying eggs. The symptoms described above can lead to a suspicion of ascariasis, but aren't enough for a full diagnosis alone.
Treatment
The choice drug for treating ascariasis is Mebendazole. This drug binds with tubulin (a structural protein) and essentially paralyzes the muscles and intestinal walls of the worms. Ivermectin (a de-worming agent) is also used in some cases, as is Nitazoxanide (a drug for treating cryptosporidia). In cases of malnutrition, supplements are often administered as well. I have heard of people undergoing surgery to remove partial intestinal blockages due to these parasites, but I haven't actually read anything on that particular subject, so I don't know how often that actually happens.
The Moral of the Story
Wash your hands...especially if you've been playing in nightsoil (soil mixed with human feces). Also, don't use nightsoil as a fertilizer for your crops (don't laugh, many parts of the world do this)...and for God's sake, wash your fruits and vegetables well! This isn't something we worry about too much here in the states because ascariasis is found more often in tropical regions, but don't think we are immune here. Just a few weeks ago someone brought into a local parasite lab a worm that their son had passed right here in Nebraska. The worm was a nice-sized female, and upon dissection she was found to have fertilized eggs, meaning the boy also had at least one male still inside of him. (Don't worry, I'm sure the good parasitologists recommended the parent get ahold of some Mebendazole.) The theory is that he got this from working on a pig farm. Pigs carry these worms in the same way that humans do...in fact, the species known to infect pigs (Ascaris suum) is so similar to A. lumbricoides that some people argue these are actually the same species! So again...keep those hands clean!
The Other Moral of the Story
It's funny how some things stick in your mind. As I advanced through school after the day I opened up that worm I fell more and more in love with biology. I went from wanting to be a psychologist, wanting to do genetic engineering, to wanting to be a herpetologist, and finally to wanting a career as a parasitologist. The progression was slow and meandering, but I can still look back on my freshman year in Zoology Lab...to that exact day learning about nematodes....and it becomes clear that I was meant to be a parasitologist all along. I guess it just took meeting other parasitophiliacs to convince my brain of what my heart must have already known. <3
As You Wish-A Post for Friends, Family, and Readers
Okay everyone, sorry that I've fallen behind in posting. The last few weeks have been pretty busy between my advisor leaving for Brazil (and me getting everything wrapped up before he left) and dealing with a side project that sort of consumed me last week.
As some of you may know, I had an encounter with a man in a coffee shop. The encounter began cordially enough...the man was sitting at the table with some friends I met a while back who meet once a week to discuss positive psychology. As I approached them with my delicious mug of Moroccan mint tea, I heard them discussing (or rather this man lecturing) about faith, hope, and love. I smiled thinking that this would be a pleasant conversation....I was in for a surprise. One of the men (the one in charge of these meetings) had to leave a little early (by "early" I mean early for him...we had already exceeded the one-hour time slot for this group discussion and had all opted to continue discussion outside of this scheduled discussion) so he excused himself and off he went, leaving me, the retired physicist (let's call him "D"), and the man still rambling (let's call him "R"). The conversation took an odd turn as R began to describe why he felt churches should be more exclusive and not let in people who do drugs and other such characters. I disagreed, but my opinion was barely noted before R continued ranting. As the rant evolved, somehow we got on the subject of homosexuality. At this point, the high and mighty R asserted that homosexuality was "unnatural".
I interjected, correcting him with a simple, "No it isn't."
This comment sent in soaring into a rage of hellfire and brimstone and culminated with him telling me "You don't know what you are talking about".
His comment unearthed within me a fury I hadn't realized dwelled within me. I leaned forward assertively and got right in his face as I said, "I have two degrees in biology, I DO know what I am talking about."
The man glared at me as I sat back into my seat and asked, "How old are you?"
I responded with my age only for him to assert that he was "3 times your age" (the guy couldn't have been any older than late 50s or early 60s) and that I couldn't possibly know more than him because I was younger. D interjected with a quick, "So you are in your 70s?" I asked if R had ever studied biology or the natural world....I asked if he had any degrees in the subject, to which he responded that he had a "degree from the university of life" and that he "had been a father and knew homosexuality was unnatural"....both excellent qualifications for discussing the subject at hand. O.o
This went on and on....he rambled about things that weren't pertinent to the discussion and tried to assert that they formed the basis for his argument. He confused gender identity issues with sexual identity issues, he claimed the bible and God himself said homosexuality was unnatural, and he said he had gay friends and loved them as people, but didn't believe they should be married because they would ruin the institution of marriage (though somewhere in there he revealed that he was divorced...one of those damn gays must have ruined his otherwise perfect marriage). Here D and I were, trying to get a word in, but maintaining a calm demeanor as R flew off the handle and caused a scene that had people all over the shop staring at us. R challenged me to find "one shred of scientific proof" that homosexuality exists in nature. All I could think was CHALLENGE FREAKING ACCEPTED!
After R left, D and I discussed the issue in a more civil manner where both of our opinions (though they were similar) could be voiced. We also had one of the barista come over and tell us that he admired our patience with dealing with R. Over the next week, I spent more time that I intended searching the literature for examples of homosexuality in nature. There was certainly no shortage of such evidence, in fact, I had to choose which studies to include in my report for R and which to just read for funzies. I learned a lot....it's amazing what you find when you look more intensely at a subject.
The next week I waited for R at the coffee shop. I even made it a point to arrive early than I am usually able to arrive to make sure I wouldn't miss him. He never showed up. I was there from noon until a little after three and there was no sign of him, so my 23 page document remained in my backpack, along with my Principles of Biology textbook, flagged with passages touching on the subject from various chapters. Several friends and family members have requested to read this document, so I decided to post it here. I know this isn't dealing with parasites themselves, but I believe that ignorance is parasitic, so in a metaphorical sense, this qualifies for the blog's theme. Plus it's my blog, so bite me.
The following is my report to R. This has been somewhat edited from it's original content to protect my own privacy in the event of pissing off someone crazy (and probably angrily ignorant), but I promise to try and leave it as untouched as possible. Be warned, it's kind of a long read. Also, please keep in mind that I wrote this in a week, so don't judge too harshly! Without further ado:
As some of you may know, I had an encounter with a man in a coffee shop. The encounter began cordially enough...the man was sitting at the table with some friends I met a while back who meet once a week to discuss positive psychology. As I approached them with my delicious mug of Moroccan mint tea, I heard them discussing (or rather this man lecturing) about faith, hope, and love. I smiled thinking that this would be a pleasant conversation....I was in for a surprise. One of the men (the one in charge of these meetings) had to leave a little early (by "early" I mean early for him...we had already exceeded the one-hour time slot for this group discussion and had all opted to continue discussion outside of this scheduled discussion) so he excused himself and off he went, leaving me, the retired physicist (let's call him "D"), and the man still rambling (let's call him "R"). The conversation took an odd turn as R began to describe why he felt churches should be more exclusive and not let in people who do drugs and other such characters. I disagreed, but my opinion was barely noted before R continued ranting. As the rant evolved, somehow we got on the subject of homosexuality. At this point, the high and mighty R asserted that homosexuality was "unnatural".
I interjected, correcting him with a simple, "No it isn't."
This comment sent in soaring into a rage of hellfire and brimstone and culminated with him telling me "You don't know what you are talking about".
His comment unearthed within me a fury I hadn't realized dwelled within me. I leaned forward assertively and got right in his face as I said, "I have two degrees in biology, I DO know what I am talking about."
The man glared at me as I sat back into my seat and asked, "How old are you?"
I responded with my age only for him to assert that he was "3 times your age" (the guy couldn't have been any older than late 50s or early 60s) and that I couldn't possibly know more than him because I was younger. D interjected with a quick, "So you are in your 70s?" I asked if R had ever studied biology or the natural world....I asked if he had any degrees in the subject, to which he responded that he had a "degree from the university of life" and that he "had been a father and knew homosexuality was unnatural"....both excellent qualifications for discussing the subject at hand. O.o
This went on and on....he rambled about things that weren't pertinent to the discussion and tried to assert that they formed the basis for his argument. He confused gender identity issues with sexual identity issues, he claimed the bible and God himself said homosexuality was unnatural, and he said he had gay friends and loved them as people, but didn't believe they should be married because they would ruin the institution of marriage (though somewhere in there he revealed that he was divorced...one of those damn gays must have ruined his otherwise perfect marriage). Here D and I were, trying to get a word in, but maintaining a calm demeanor as R flew off the handle and caused a scene that had people all over the shop staring at us. R challenged me to find "one shred of scientific proof" that homosexuality exists in nature. All I could think was CHALLENGE FREAKING ACCEPTED!
After R left, D and I discussed the issue in a more civil manner where both of our opinions (though they were similar) could be voiced. We also had one of the barista come over and tell us that he admired our patience with dealing with R. Over the next week, I spent more time that I intended searching the literature for examples of homosexuality in nature. There was certainly no shortage of such evidence, in fact, I had to choose which studies to include in my report for R and which to just read for funzies. I learned a lot....it's amazing what you find when you look more intensely at a subject.
The next week I waited for R at the coffee shop. I even made it a point to arrive early than I am usually able to arrive to make sure I wouldn't miss him. He never showed up. I was there from noon until a little after three and there was no sign of him, so my 23 page document remained in my backpack, along with my Principles of Biology textbook, flagged with passages touching on the subject from various chapters. Several friends and family members have requested to read this document, so I decided to post it here. I know this isn't dealing with parasites themselves, but I believe that ignorance is parasitic, so in a metaphorical sense, this qualifies for the blog's theme. Plus it's my blog, so bite me.
The following is my report to R. This has been somewhat edited from it's original content to protect my own privacy in the event of pissing off someone crazy (and probably angrily ignorant), but I promise to try and leave it as untouched as possible. Be warned, it's kind of a long read. Also, please keep in mind that I wrote this in a week, so don't judge too harshly! Without further ado:
Authentically Natural: An Examination of Homosexuality as a Component of the Natural World
By: Me :)
INTRODUCTIONS
Who
is this 26-year-old punk biologist?
When
we officially met for the first time last week, you made several incorrect
assumptions about me. First, I must apologize for accidentally deceiving you. I
recently had a birthday and I’m not used to calling myself 26 yet. So, I’m not
25…sorry about that. The way I figure, if we are going to have a civil
conversation, we should know more about one another. Here’s who I am.
I’m
a 26-year-old Christian woman raised on a farm in a small town in Texas. Despite
not having a lot of money growing up, I was extremely active in my community
and in high school activities. I was an athlete for a short period of time
(basketball, cross-country, track, and long jump). I was an artist in many
different ways (musician, thespian, prose orator, poet, writer...I also dabbled
in a number of craft-type works of art). I loved science as a general
subject…it was always my favorite subject. Biology held my fascination the most
of any of the branches of this subject. I competed in U.I.L Science along with
a multitude of other academic competitions. I also loved promoting school
spirit by serving as my school’s mascot for the last two years of high school.
I graduated in 2005 as the class valedictorian. I remember praying as I
prepared for my speech. I asked God to give me the right words, and as always,
my God delivered. In my speech, I quoted
one of my favorite songs by Semisonic. The quote was “Every new beginning comes from some other beginning’s end”. I knew
that these words were perfect for such a speech, but I didn’t know just how
often they would return to resonate throughout my life.
As
this chapter of my life ended, I began a new chapter as a college student. I
learned many things over the next four years. I learned more about the natural
world and fell in love with it for its fascinating complexity. I learned that I
didn’t know nearly as much about this subject as I had once thought. I also learned that there were a lot of other
things I didn’t know. I made lots of new friends and embraced a diversity of
people that I had never been exposed to before. I learned about other cultures
and other races. I learned about other faiths and other political viewpoints. I
learned about people by not judging them and by actually taking the time to get
to know them. I met gay people, lesbian people, transgendered people, and
asexual people. I’d like to emphasize that I didn’t meet “gays” or “lesbians”,
I met people. These people were
interesting and taught me that there were more to them than I had ever
realized. I’ve always felt like I was a compassionate person, but these new
friends helped me to realize just how uncompassionate I had been towards people
who were different from me. I was never outright mean to anyone, but I
certainly had my prejudices. I’m not proud of this fact, but that doesn’t make
it any less true. I am proud that I was mature enough to admit this fact and
after intense prayer, I feel as if I have truly repented of my judgmental sins.
I know in my heart that God blessed me with the ability to analyze information
critically and to use that information to rationalize things that don’t make
sense to me. I firmly believe that he sends people into our lives for a reason.
Jesus was known as the great teacher, so it makes sense that we are all
students, and that we all have lessons to learn. But like any good student, we
have to keep our minds and hearts open, and we can’t fall asleep when we don’t
like the subject matter if we actually want to learn anything.
Getting
back to college, I graduated in May 2009 with a Bachelors of Science in
Organismal Biology with a second major in History (the majority of my history
classes were in U.S. history, but were still generally well-rounded). I began
graduate school the following August. I finished my Masters of Biological Sciences
in May of 2012. A few months previous I had received my acceptance letter from a PhD program to which I had applied. I first laid eyes on my new home-city in June when we came to look for a place to
live and for my fiancé to apply for jobs in our future new home. In July I
married the love of my life after dating for four years, and then we jetted off
to a resort in Mexico for what most experts would have to agree was the most
amazing honeymoon anyone has ever had ever. In August, we packed up our
belongings and headed up to this city. I began my work as a Ph.D. student a few
weeks later. So many new beginnings born from the end of this chapter of my life.
I
am now studying ancient parasitism under a world expert in the field of
Archaeoparasitology (in fact, he coined the term itself). I’ve learned a great
deal more since moving here. My knowledge of parasites and the people who study
them has at least tripled since I arrived last August. As before, I’ve made a
lot of new and diverse friends. I’ve learned even more about how different
people are and how wonderful those differences can be. Some of my new friends
are homosexuals. They are such amazing and fun people! They throw great parties
and always go out of their way to make people feel included at group events. I
can’t even count the number of gay men I have met in the last few months
because if we are at a gathering, they always make it a point to introduce
themselves and ask me about what I do. Such a simple act of kindness is
appreciated when you don’t know many of the people surrounding you. After meeting you last Friday, I attended a
birthday party for a gay friend. I wore a pretty, full-length dress and pair of
adorable shoes. We ended up walking more than we had expected to be walking and
my feet began to hurt terribly. I mentioned my pain to my friend and without
much thought he offered to run a few blocks back to another friend’s apartment
to get me some flip-flops, but I didn’t want to split up the group on my
account. Then my friend did something totally unexpected…he offered to swap me
for his flat, comfy-looking shoes. I didn’t think he was serious, but he was.
He wore the heels even after some fraternity boys walking along the sidewalks downtown called
him a “faggot”. He didn’t care. He didn’t want me to be in pain anymore. He
wore those shoes until my feet had recovered and then we swapped shoes again so
he could go dance with his friends for his birthday. This was the most selfless
act of love anyone other than my husband had done for me in years. Words cannot
express how blessed I am to know this man, nor can they adequately express how
thankful I am that God opened my eyes and my heart so many years ago.
I
suppose this all boils down to me needing you to realize that I’m not just some
punk that pissed you off with bullshit last week. I am a person who has been
fascinated by the natural world all of my life. I have spent the better part of
the last decade dedicating my life to studying biological systems and the
organisms that comprise them. I moved to a new state where I barely knew anyone
with my wonderfully supportive husband to become better educated about my
passion, and to build a career as a biologist. I am qualified to discuss matters of biology despite my age and your perception of the correlation that is, in
all actuality, non-existent between the two. I am also an avid supporter for
the rights of homosexuals. I support their civil rights not because some
politician told me to, not because my parents told me to, not because my priest
told me to…but because I got to know homosexuals. I also support their rights
because I have logically analyzed both sides of arguments regarding the rights
of homosexuals over the years and the only rational explanation from legal,
scientific, and religious viewpoints was that they have the right to enjoy the
same lives, liberties, and pursuits of happiness as any other American.
EXAMINING
HOMOSEXUALITY
A
Biological Perspective
I
suppose the best way to start is to begin with the subject about which I know
the most. First, let us define a few words so that we are all on the same page
about what those words mean.
Gender Identity--This
refers to a person’s sense of and subjective experience of their own gender.
Whether a person identifies themself as being male or female is not a function
of their sex chromosomes. Rather, gender identity is a function of one’s own
inner perceptions and feelings about their gender.
Sexual Identity--This
refers to how one thinks of oneself in terms of whom one is romantically or
sexually attracted to. Like gender identity, this is not a function of sex
chromosomes, but rather a function of physical and psychological attraction.
Sexual Orientation--This
refers to an enduring personal quality that inclines people to feel romantic or
sexual attraction to persons of the opposite or same sex or gender or to both
sexes or to more than one gender. These attractions are generally called
heterosexuality, homosexuality, bisexuality, or asexuality, but there are
subcategories within some of these more broad groupings. Generally, there are
three components that make up one’s sexual orientation: Sexual attraction,
sexual behavior, and sexual identity. There is no simple cause for sexual
orientation. Research suggests that biological factors such as genetics and
biochemistry as well as environmental factors influence sexual orientation.
Sexuality has also been shown by research to be fluid, and to be existent in
various gradations rather than existing dichotomously.
Transgendered--This
refers to individuals who have tendencies that are different from the
conventionally accepted gender roles. Transgendered individuals feel there is a
discrepancy with their assigned gender and their internal sense of gender.
These individuals typically do not seek to change their bodies surgically. This
is a state of a person’s gender identity and has nothing to do with one’s
sexual orientation.
Transsexual--This
refers to individuals who do not identify with the gender they were assigned at
birth. They often (but don’t always)
seek surgery in order to make their bodies reflect their gender identity.
Again, this is a function of gender identity, not sexual orientation.
Intersex (a.k.a. hermaphroditism in non-human
species)--This refers to a variation in sex characteristics
including chromosomes, gonads, and/or genitals that do not allow an individual
to be distinctly identified as male or female. Being an intersexed individual
may include genital ambiguity, and/or combinations of genotypes or phenotypes
other than XY or XX and their associated phenotypes.
Gynandromorph--This
refers to an organism that contains both male and female characteristics. These
animals have astonishingly distinctive demarcations between their male and
female appearances. Gynandromorphic
individuals are found in various species of animals including spiders,
butterflies, moths, lobsters, crabs, birds, and even small mammals.
Parthnogenesis--This
is a type of asexual reproduction through which embryos develop without
fertilization from sperm. Offspring are genetically identical to the parent individual.
Okay,
now that we all know what these words mean, let’s talk sexual diversity in
nature. There are over 1,500 species
that have been observed displaying homosexual behaviors. (Bagemihl, 1999) Many
instances of humans observing such behaviors were never formally documented or
were outright rejected for fear of reprimand by the scientific community
existing within societies not yet accepting of such concepts. However, the
sexual diversity of the natural world remains a biological truth whether or not
man choses to believe in its existence.
There
are a variety of homosexual behaviors displayed by non-human animal species.
These behaviors include mating rituals directed at members of the same sex,
copulation with members of the same sex, displays of affection among members of
the same sex, genital stimulation of members of the same sex without copulation,
and even parenting of offspring by two members of the same sex.
“The
animal kingdom [does] it with much greater sexual diversity--including
homosexual, bisexual, and non-reproductive sex--than the scientific community
and society at large have previously been willing to accept.”
--Bruce Bagemihl, Ph.D. (Canadian Biologist and Linguist)--
homosexual, bisexual, and non-reproductive sex--than the scientific community
and society at large have previously been willing to accept.”
--Bruce Bagemihl, Ph.D. (Canadian Biologist and Linguist)--
A plethora
of species display such behaviors. (See Appendix 1-7). Let’s start with insects. At least 11 species
of dragonflies and damselflies have been documented as having mating damage on
the heads of males in 20%-80% of a population. You see, these animals have an
interesting way of engaging in sex. The males have little claspers on their
abdomens that they use to grip the region behind the head of the females during
copulation. In the process, females
contract “mating damage” to those bodily regions. Males do not use their
claspers for defensive purposes. The discovery of mating damage on these
animals indicates that they engage in homosexual coupling behaviors (Utzeri and
Belfiore, 1990). Bed bugs also have been
shown to engage in homosexual mounting (Ryne, 2009). Fruit flies (Drosophila melanogaster) have been used
to study the genetic basis of homosexuality. If a male of this species bears
two copies of a particular allele within a certain gene, the male will mate
exclusively with other males of the species (Gailey and Hall, 1989). Later studies covered the alteration of brain
structure in homosexual individuals (Yamamoto, et al., 1998). Other studies
further examined this phenomenon in this species, but we won’t cover them
further for our purposes.
Okay,
but these are just insects, higher animals couldn’t possibly be homosexual,
right? Wrong. Whiptail lizards (belonging to the family Teiidae) undergo
parthenogenesis more often than they engage in sexual behaviors for
reproductive purposes. For this reason, males are rare in many of these
species. Often times, female will engage in homosexual behaviors in order to
stimulate ovulation. Hormones are triggered by such behaviors and engaging in
such behaviors have been shown to actually increase the success of asexual
reproduction. Mating pairs will switch between “masculine” and “feminine”
sexual positions and roles from one mating season to another. Some geckos are also known to reproduce in a
similar manner (Kearney, et al., 2005).
Female homosexuality has also been observed in American chameleons (Anolis) and male homosexuality has been
observed in members of the family Iguanidae (Denniston, 1980).
Still,
those are lizards, surely there’s not more advanced animals that are
homosexuals. Wrong again. Birds have
been shown to display both homosexual and transgender behaviors. The list of
birds that display such behaviors is extensive to put it mildly. Everything
from black swans to ibises, to gulls, to mallards, to pigeons, and vultures can
be found on this list. Flamingos and
penguins have been known to form homosexual committed relationships in
which same-sex birds engage in sex, travel together, live together, and even
raising young together (Smith, 2004). Almost a quarter of all black swan (Cygnus atratus) couples are homosexual.
Male homosexuals will sometimes form temporary threesomes with a female, and
then drive her from the nest in order to raise the offspring without her help
(Goudarzi, 2006; Imaginova, 2007). A
South American bird (Rupicola rupicola)
is known to have populations with upwards of 40% of the population engaging in
regular homosexual activities. Some of
these birds never copulate with members of the opposite sex (Bagemihl, 1999;
Imaginova, 2007). Just like with
insects, I could go on, but I think I’ve made my point about birds and
homosexuality.
Still
thinking all of this evidence doesn’t apply? How about we look at mammals? Domestic animals such as sheep, cattle, and
horses have been known to engage in homosexual activities, as have pets such as
budgerigars, cats, and dogs (Bagemihl, 1999).
Ever wonder why dolphins are sometimes
associated with lesbians? Perhaps it is
because at least two species of this animal have been observed performing
homosexual (and heterosexual) acts of nasal sex (penetration of the
blowhole). Or perhaps it is because some
bottlenose dolphin females have sexual encounters known as “beak-genital
propulsion”, in which a female inserts her beak into another female’s genital
opening while swimming forward. (Norris and Dohl, 1980). Males of this species have been known to rub
their genitals together, swim belly to belly, and even engage in anal sex
(Wells, 1995). Dolphins have also engaged in group sex of both homosexual and
heterosexual compositions. Some dolphins
will even have sex with dolphins of other species. It is also evident that dolphins have sex for
pleasure in addition to sex for procreation (Bagemihl, 1999; Sylvestre,1985).
Let’s
move out of the ocean and onto land. Some
of the first homosexual behaviors observed in animals were among wild
rams. Male rams were seen readily mating
with other males even when females were readily available for coitus. These males seemed to refuse to mate with the
females despite seasonal conditions. A
behavior known as “foreleg kicking” is part of the mating ritual in these
animals. This behavior involves the male
gently tapping their forelegs on the genitals of the female to prepare for
intercourse. This behavior has been documented
between males. As many as 10% of these
rams displayed this and other homosexual mating behavior in the populations
observed (LeVay, 2011). Foreleg kicking
is also a part of mating rituals in other animals. In kobs (a type of African antelope), females
are often observed performing foreleg kicking and mounting other females. As in rams, these behaviors occur even during
the breeding season when there are plenty of males available for procreating
(Imaginova, 2007; Bagemihl, 2000).
The
American bison has been known to have courtship, mounting, and full anal
penetration between bulls (Bagemihl, 2000).
Native Americans even had ceremonies reenacting this behavior to make
sure the buffalo would be back in the next year. Speaking of gentle homosexual
giants, elephants and giraffes also engage in same-sex mounting and pair
bonding, as demonstrated by shows of affection such as d trunk playing and
necking. Heterosexual relations among these animals are typically fleeting,
while homosexual partnerships may last for years (Bagemihl, 1999). Lions, monkeys, hyenas, polecats, moose,
rabbits, mice, foxes, zebras, and apes all have homosexual activity among
populations. Homosexuality is
particularly high in giraffes…sometimes reaching as much as 90% among male in a
population (Bagemihl, 1999; Coe, 1967).
Reports
of primates displaying homosexual behaviors are numerous, to put it mildly. Such behaviors occur more often than
incidentally, and should not be dismissed as aberrations in sexual norms among
these animals (Small, 1993). Baboons
have been known to form monogamous homosexual relationships. Some of these relationships have been
documented as lasting up to 6 years in wild populations. Homosexual mounting has been reported as
being common in various species of monkeys and has been studied in rhesus
monkeys, stumptail macaques (Mitchell, 1979), Japanese macaques (Mahlman and
Chapais, 1988), and others.
Homosexuality also exists among chimpanzees, mountain gorillas
(Yamagiwa, 1987; Yamagiwa 1992; Edwards and Todd, 1987), pygmy chimpanzees
(Savage and Bakeman, 1978), siamangs, and gibbons (Edwards and Todd, 1987).
Going
a step further, let’s touch briefly on other forms of sexual diversity in
nature. Some species are completely
asexual, for example, sea urchins never engage in sexual acts at all and rely
on other methods for reproduction.
Remember that word gynandromorph? I won’t go over it again, but these
individuals are ideal examples sexual diversity in nature. Bisexuality occurs within a number of species
naturally, and not just in those that are hermaphroditic. As you’ve already been told, animals such as
elephants and giraffes have fleeting heterosexual relationships that turn into
a more monogamous type of relationship outside of the breeding season when
homosexual relationships are resumed or begun between two males. This is a sort of conditional form of
bisexuality. Some species are bisexuals
in a much more strict sense of the word.
Bonobos
are incredibly sexual primates. The
majority of their day is consumed with sexual intercourse or other sexual
acts. The bonobos aren’t having this
much sex just to procreate, they use sex for a variety of purposes outside of
reproduction. Females have been observed
choosing genital-to-genital rubbing with other females over engaging in sexual
activities with a male (Small, 1993). Sometimes
sex is used to end arguments over food.
These animals have been observed fighting over food, then engaging in
sexual activities, followed by sharing of the food between the post-coital
couple. Age and fitness do not seem to influence the decision to have sex in
these animals. These are not monogamous animals, but they do show signs of
affection before, during, and after sexual encounters whether they be of a
heterosexual or a homosexual nature. These animals typically engage in sex
facing one another, something previously only seen in humans. Sex is a vital tool for these animals that is
used to maintain a peaceful, affectionate, corporative, bisexual, society.
Now
that you know that sexual diversity does, in fact, exist in nature, let’s talk
about some of the biological mechanisms that impact a human’s sexual
orientation. I honestly tried very hard
last week not to laugh when you requested that I present a “gay gene”, but that
reaction wasn’t very Christian of me. I shouldn’t have laughed, even inwardly,
at your ignorance of this particular subject matter. Please accept my humble
apology, and allow me explain first, why this phrase is, in and of itself,
asinine. Afterwards, I will site a few
studies published in peer-reviewed, scientific journals in which the internal
biological factors of homosexuality are examined.
The
presence of the concept of a “gay gene” reveals just how little the general
public understands about genetics and the way that genes function. A genetic
characteristic as complex as one’s sexual orientation is not going to be
controlled by a single gene. In humans,
our eye color alone is controlled by 16 different genes, with two playing the
leading role in iris color determination.
Think about it, if it takes 16 genes to determine the color of your
eyes, how many genes would it take to determine sexual attraction? No one has
been able to determine exactly how many genes control sexual orientation, but
there is significant evidence to suggest that sexual orientation is based, at
least in part, on genetic components. (Thornton, et al., 2009; Garcia-Falgueras
and Swaab, 2010; Bogaert and Skorska, 2011)
Hormones
and neurotransmitters have also been shown to play a role in sexual
orientation. Studies of mice have shown that 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) is
required for male sexual preference (Liu, et al., 2011). This neurotransmitter is more commonly known
as serotonin, and is believed to be involved in our feelings of happiness and
well-being.
“Here
we report that the neurotransmitter 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)...Wild-type male
mice preferred females over males, but males lacking central serotonergic
neurons [such as those releasing 5-HT] lost sexual preference although they
were not generally defective in olfaction or in pheromone sensing...These
results indicate that 5-HT and serotonergic neurons in the adult brain regulate
mammalian sexual preference.”
--Liu,
et al., 2011--
Other
studies involving mice have shown that disabling the fucose mutarotase gene
(which adjusts the brain’s exposure to estrogen) causes female mice to behave as
if they were males when they reach sexual maturity (Park, et. al., 2010). This is similar to the study looking at
induced homosexuality in fruit flies mentioned earlier. Although these studies focus on single genes
or particular neurotransmitters, the researchers acknowledge that other genes
and multiple neurotransmitters as well as hormones must play a role in these
complex behaviors.
Some
researchers believe that birth order may influence the likelihood of
homosexuality among males. The association
between birth order and male sexual orientation is termed “the fraternal birth
order effect” (Valenzuela, 2010). The cause for this effect is unknown,
however, researchers have a working theory that involves the maternal immune
system. According to this theory, the
first time a woman becomes pregnant with a male, her body’s immune system
reacts to it as if it is a foreign body, which is often why pregnancies with
males are more difficult that pregnancies with females. As the pregnant mother-to-be’s body releases
antigens and antibodies to protect the mother, the immune system “learns” how
to identify males. With successive
pregnancies involving male fetuses, the body knows how to identify these male
threats and begins to produce less testosterone in an attempt to subdue the
threat. The more boys a mother gives
birth to, the higher the chance that her next son will be homosexual. (Blanchard and Bogaert, 1996; Blanchard and
Klassen, 1997; Blanchard, 2001; Blanchard, 2004).
Another
interesting study conducted in the early 90s showed that the hypothalamus of
homosexual males was smaller than that of heterosexual males. This structure is used to regulate sexual
behavior. The size of this structure was
equivalent in homosexual males with the same structure in heterosexual females
(LeVay, 1991; Angier, 1992). Other anatomical studies showed that the anterior
commissure of homosexual men is larger than the structure in both heterosexual
men and women. This structure is a
bundle of nerves that allow for both halves of the brain to communicate with
each other (Allen and Gorski, 1992). Studies have further shown hormonal
differences between homosexuals and heterosexuals (West, 1977). A particularly well-written article expands
on these and other aspects of homosexuality in nature. I suggest reading Homosexuality: A Paradox of Evolution by Preston Hunter. Keep in mind that this was written in 1994
and that many more studies have come out since its publication.
A
Psychological Perspective
On
Friday you asserted that being a homosexual was a choice. Now that we have examined the biological
reasons why such a statement is untrue, let us look briefly at homosexuality
from a psychological point of view.
For
many years people used to believe that homosexuality was a choice. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of
Mental Disorders (a.k.a. “The DSM”) once listed being gay as a disorder known
as “androphilia” and being a lesbian as a disorder known as “gynephilia”. Similar terms were also once used to refer to
transgendered people (“auto-gynephilia/auto-androphilia”). All terms associated with homosexuality were
removed from the DSM in 1973, but were replaced by the phrase “ego-dystonic
homosexuality” which addressed a “lack of heterosexual arousal” coupled with a
“persistent distress from a sustained pattern of unwanted homosexual
arousal”. This new diagnosis only
applied to homosexuals who didn’t want to accept their sexual orientation. This came under harsh criticisms by some
psychoanalysts who still believed homosexuality could be treated with
conversion therapy. After years of
debate among professionals in the field, the diagnosis was removed completely
from the DSM in 1986.
Since
that time, many other professional organizations have stated that sexual
orientation is not a choice and that it is not something that can be
changed. These organizations strongly
oppose attempts at conversion therapy and instead advocate for families and
friends of homosexuals to be supportive of their loved one’s innate sexual
identity. These organizations include:
- · The American Psychological Association (publish the DSM)
- · The National Association of Social Workers
- · The American Psychiatric Association
- · The American Academy of Pediatrics
- · The American Psychoanalytic Association
- · The American Medical Association
Mental
health professionals have agreed since the 1970s that homosexuality is a
normal, natural form of human sexual orientation (APA, 2009). Homosexuality was declassified as a mental
disorder first by The American Psychiatric Association in 1973 and then by The
American Psychological Association in 1975 (Bayer, 1987). Many other organizations did the same in the
years that followed. By 1990,
homosexuality was declassified by the World Health Organization.
Many
studies have looked at sexual orientation from a psychological perspective, but
few are more famous that the Kinsey studies of the 1940s and 1950s. The studies showed that sexual orientation
was not as black-and-white as people had once believed. In fact, most people
fall somewhere between exclusively heterosexual and exclusively
homosexual. These studies culminated in
the creation of a scale known as the Kinsey Scale. This scale is depicted below.
|
Rating
|
Description
|
|
0
|
Exclusively heterosexual. Individuals make no physical contact which results in
erotic arousal or orgasm and make no psychic responses to individuals of
their own sex.
|
|
1
|
Predominantly
heterosexual/incidentally homosexual.
Individuals have only incidental homosexual contacts which have involved
physical or psychic response or incidental psychic response without physical
contact.
|
|
2
|
Predominantly heterosexual but
more than incidentally homosexual.
Individuals have more than incidental homosexual experience and/or respond
rather definitely to homosexual stimuli.
|
|
3
|
Equally heterosexual and
homosexual. Individuals are about equally
homosexual and heterosexual in their experiences and/or psychic reactions.
|
|
4
|
Predominantly homosexual but more
than incidentally heterosexual.
Individuals have more overt activity and/or psychic reactions in the
homosexual while still maintaining a fair amount of heterosexual activity
and/or responding rather definitively to heterosexual contact.
|
|
5
|
Predominantly homosexual/only
incidentally heterosexual.
Individuals are almost entirely homosexual in their activities and/or reactions.
|
|
6
|
Exclusively homosexual. Individuals who are exclusively homosexual, both in
regard to their overt experience and in regard to their psychic reactions.
|
This
scale has been adapted by many other researchers and is the predecessor to more
commonly used scales found in modern psychological and psychiatric research.
More modern techniques include the Klein Sexual Orientation Grid (KSOG), which
is more multidimensional, as well as Sell Assessment of Sexual Orientation
(SASO), which measures sexual orientation on a continuum and is meant to
provoke discussion rather than to provide a final solution (Klein, et al.,
1985; Sell, 1997). Assessing one’s sexual orientation typically involves
assessing three components: Sexual Attraction, Sexual Behavior, and Sexual
Identity.
I
believe that you also mentioned something about being opposed to same-sex
parenting. While you are entitled to
your own opinion, I felt it would be pertinent to point out that many (almost
all) social scientists agree that this form of parenting is not psychologically
damaging to children. There is no
scientific literature supporting the assertion that heterosexual parents are
inherently better than homosexual parents.
In fact, many organizations regularly issue reports in support of the
rights for gay and lesbian parents.
These organizations include the following:
- · The American Academy of Pediatrics
- · The American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
- · The American Psychiatric Association
- · The American Psychological Association
- · The American Psychoanalytic Association
- · The National Association of Social Workers
- · The Child Welfare League of America
- · The North American Council on Adoptable Children
- · The Canadian Psychological Association (CPA).
CONCLUSIONS
I
suppose it is about time that I wrap up this report. After all, every new
beginning comes from some other beginning’s end. This is the end of my report to you, but I
anticipate that it is a new beginning for you and your understanding this
subject from a scientific perspective. I
hope that this new-found knowledge inspires you to delve deeper into the
science of homosexuality. I’m not looking to change your opinion on
homosexuality in terms of whether you see it as “right” or “wrong”, but I hope
I have educated you enough on the subject for you to realize that homosexuality
is natural in both a biological sense and in a psychological sense.
Throughout
this report, I have demonstrated, using sound, scientific evidence, that a
great variety of animals display homosexual behaviors and also that many of
these animals form monogamous homosexual partnerships. Homosexual parenting has
also been observed in nature and the offspring from such parenting strategies
seem to fair just as well as offspring raised by heterosexual parents.
I
have also presented a number of studies discussing the biological and
psychological aspects of human sexual orientation. As discussed previous, many
factors come into play with the development of an individual’s sexual
orientation. Many of these factors are not completely understood, but as
research progresses, new insights regarding the causal effects of hormones,
neurotransmitters, and genes begins to emerge. Advances in psychological and
psychiatric research continue to show that sexual orientation is not something
that one chooses, nor is it an aspect of one’s psyche that can be changed by
“reparative” or “conversion” therapies.
In
conclusion, our sexual orientation is a function of our biology and wide
variety of sexual diversity is present in the natural world of which we are a
part. Opposition to homosexuality and
other non-heterosexual forms of sexual orientation are not valid from
biological and psychological perspectives. Discrimination against individuals
with these forms of sexual orientation is consequently not justified by these
fields of science. Cultural and religious perspective may agree or disagree
with homosexuality, but have no bearing on the scientific realities of this
subject.
REFERENCES
Allen, L. S. and R. A.
Gorski. 1992. Sexual orientation and the size of the
anterior commissure in the human brain.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of
America. 89(15): 7199-7202.
Angier, Natalie.
"Researchers Find a Second Anatomical Idiosyncrasy." New York
Times. (1 August 1992) p. A7.
APA
Task Force on Appropriate Therapeutic Responses to Sexual Orientation. 2009.
Report
of the Task Force on Appropriate Therapeutic Responses to Sexual Orientation.
Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Bagemihl, B. Biological Exuberance: Animal Homosexuality and Natural Diversity. St. Martin’s Press. New York, 1999.
Bagemihl, B. 2000.
Left-handed bears and androgynous cassowaries: Homosexual/transgendered
animals and indigenous knowledge. Whole
Earth Magazine.
Bayer, R. Homosexuality and
American Psychiatry: The Politics of Diagnosis. Princeton: Princeton
University Press. 1987.
Blanchard, R. 2001.
Fraternal birth order and the maternal immune hypothesis of male
homosexuality. Hormones and
Behavior. 40(2): 105-114.
Blanchard, R. 2004.
Quantitative and theoretical analyses of the relation between older
brothers and homosexuality in men.
Journal of Theoretical Biology.
230(2): 173-187.
Blanchard, R. and A. F.
Bogaert. 1996. Homosexuality in men and number of older
brothers. The American Journal of
Psychiatry. 153(1): 27-31.
Blanchard, R. and P.
Klassen. 1997. H-Y antigen and homosexuality in men. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 185(3):
373-378.
Bogaert, A. F. and M.
Skorska. 2011. Sexual orientation, fraternal birth order,
and the maternal immune hypothesis: a review.
Frontiers in neuroendocrinology.
32(2): 247-254.
Brentlinger, R. Gay Christian
101: Spiritual Self-Defense for Gay Christians
Coe, M. J. 1967.
Necking behavior in giraffes. Journal
of Zoology (London). 151(3): 313-321.
Denniston, R. H.
"Ambisexuality in Animals." In Judd Marmor (ed.) Homosexual
Behavior: A Modern Reappraisal: A Modern Reappraisal. New York: Basic
Books, Inc., 1980, pp. 25-40.
Edwards, A. A. R. and J. D. Todd. 1987. Homosexual Behaviour in Wild White-handed
Gibbons (Hylobates lar ). Primates.
32(2): 231-236.
Gailey, D.
A., and J. C. Hall. 1989. Behavior and Cytogenetics of Fruitless in
Drosophila melangogaster Courtship Defects Caused by Separate, Closely Linked
Lesions. Genetics. 121(4): 773-785.
Garcia-Falgueras,
A., and D. F. Swaab. 2010. Sexual
Hormones and the Brain: An Essential Alliance for Sexual Identity and Sexual
Orientation, in Endocrine
Development. Pediatric
Neuroendocrinology. 17: 22–35.
Goudarzi, S.
2006. Gay Animals Out of the Closet?:
First-ever Museum Display Shows 51 Species Exhibiting Homosexuality. MSNBC.
Hunter,
P. 1994.
Homosexuality: A Paradox of Evolution.
http://www.adherents.com/misc/paradoxEvolution.html
Imaginova.
2007. Gay Animals: Alternative Lifestyles in the Wild.
Kearney, M.,
R. Wahl, and K. Autumn. 2005. Physiological and Biochemical Zoology. 78:
316-324.
Kinsey, A. 1948. Sexual Behavior
in the Human Male.
Kinsey, A., W. Pomeroy, and C.
Martin. 1953. Sexual Behavior in the Human Male.
Klein, F., B. Sepekoff, and T. J.
Wolf. 1985. Sexual Orientation: A Multi-Variable Dynamic
Process. Journal of Homosexuality. 11(1-2): 35-49.
LeVay, S. 1991.
A Difference in Hypothalamic Structure Between Heterosexual and
Homosexual Men. Science. 253: 1034-1037.
LeVay, S. Gay,
Straight, and the Reason Why: The Science of Sexual Orientation. Oxford
University Press, New York. 2011.
Liu, Y., Y. Jiang, Y. Si, J. Kim,
Z. Chen, and Y. Rao. 2011. Molecular regulation of sexual preference revealed
by genetic studies of 5-HT in the brains of male mice. Nature. 472: 95-99.
Mehlman, P. T. and B. Chapais. 1988. Differential Effects of Kinship, Dominance,
and the Mating Season on Female Allogrooming in a Captive Group of Macaca
fuscata . Primates. 29 (2): 195-217.
Mitchell, G. Behavioral Sex Differences in Nonhuman
Primates. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, 1979.
Norris, K.S., and T.P. Dohl. 1980.
Behaviour of the Hawaiian spinner dolphin, Stenella longirostris.
Fishery Bulletin. 77: 821-849.
Park, D., D. Choi, J. Lee, D.
Lim, and C. Park. 2010. Male-like sexual
behavior of female mouse lacking fucose mutarotase. BMC Genetics. 11:62.
Roughgarden, J. Evolution's
Rainbow: Diversity, Gender and Sexuality in Nature and People. Paperback ed. Los Angeles: Univ. of
California Press, 2004.
Ryne, C.
2009. Homosexual interaction in bed
bugs: alarm pheromones as male recognition signals. Animal Behavior. 78(6):
1471-1475.
Savage, S. and R. Bakeman. "Sexual Morphology and
Behavior in Pan paniscus. " In D. J. Chivers and J. Herbert
(eds.) Recent Advances in Primatology: Volume One: Behaviour. New
York: Academic Press, 1978.
Sell, R. L. 1997.
Defining and measuring sexual orientation: A review. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 26: 43-58.
Small, M. F. Female
Choices: Sexual Behavior of Female Primates. Ithaca, New York: Cornell
University Press, 1993.
Smith, D.
2004. Love that dare not squeak its
name. http://www.nytimes.com/2004/02/07/arts/love-that-dare-not-squeak-its-name.html?src=pm
Sylvestre, J-P. 1985. Some observations on behavior of two Orinoco
dolphins (Inia geoffrensis humbolultiana)
in captivity, at Duisburg Zoo. Aquatic
Mammals. 11(2): 58-65.
Terry, J. 2000. Unnatural acts in nature: The
scientific fascination with queer animals. GLQ. 6(2): 151-193.
Thornton,
J., J. L. Zehr, and M. D. Loose.
2009. Effects of prenatal
androgens on rhesus monkeys: a model system to explore the organizational
hypothesis in primates. Hormones and
behavior. 55(5): 633-645.
Utzeri C.,
and C. Belfiore. 1990. Anomalous tandems in Odonata. Fragmenta Entomologica. 22
(2): 271–288.
Valenzuela,
C. 2010.
Sexual Orientation, Handedness, Sex Ratio, and Fetomaternal
Tolerance-Rejection. Biological
Research. 43: 347-356.
Wells, R.S. 1995.
Community structure of bottlenose dolphins near Sarasota, Florida.
Presented at the 24th International Ethological Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii.
West, D. J. Homosexuality
Re-examined. London: Gerald Duckwort & Co. Ltd, 1977.
Yamagiwa,
J. 1987.
Intra- and Inter-group Interactions of an All-male Group of Virunga
Mountain Gorillas (Gorilla gorilla beringei ). Primates. 28(1): 1-30.
Yamagiwa,
J. 1992.
Functional Analysis of Social Staring Behavior in an All-male Group of
Mountain Gorillas. Primates. 33(4): 523-544.
Yamamoto,
D., K. Fujitani, K. Usui, H. Ito, and Y. Nakano. 1998.
From behavior to development: genes for sexual behavior define the
neuronal sexual switch in Drosophila. Mechanisms of Development. 73(2):
135-146.
Appendix
I:
A List of Insects Displaying Homosexual Behaviors
A List of Insects Displaying Homosexual Behaviors
· Blowfly
· Common Skimmer
spp.
· Cutworm
· Hen Flea
|
|
Appendix
II:
A List of Other Invertebrates
Displaying Homosexual Behaviors
A List of Other Invertebrates
Displaying Homosexual Behaviors
·
Box Crab
·
Hawaiian
Orb-Weaver
Appendix
III:
A List of Fish Displaying Homosexual Behaviors
A List of Fish Displaying Homosexual Behaviors
·
Char
·
Grayling
Appendix
IV:
A List of Amphibians
Displaying Homosexual Behaviors
A List of Amphibians
Displaying Homosexual Behaviors
Appendix
V:
A List of Reptiles Displaying Homosexual Behaviors
A List of Reptiles Displaying Homosexual Behaviors
Appendix
VI:
A List of Birds Displaying Homosexual Behaviors
A List of Birds Displaying Homosexual Behaviors
· Barn Owl
· Blue Tit
· Calfbird
· Emu
|
· Galah
· Jackdaw
· Kestrel
· Mallard
· Mew Gull
· Ostrich
|
· Raven
· Ruff
|
Appendix
VII:
A List of Mammals Displaying Homosexual Behaviors
A List of Mammals Displaying Homosexual Behaviors
|
· Antelope
· Beluga
· Bharal
· Buffalo
· Caribou
· Cheetah
· Donkey
· Dugong
· Elk
· Fox
· Gazelle
· Giraffe
· Gorilla
|
· Javelina
· Koala
· Lechwe
· Lion
· Macaque
· Markhor
· Marten
· Moco
· Moose
· Musk-ox
· Noctule
|
· Puku
· Quokka
· Rabbit
· Red Deer
· Red Fox
· Reindeer
· Roe Deer
· Siamang
· Takhi
· Talapoin
· Tiger
· Tucuxi
· Urial
· Vervet
· Vicuna
· Wapiti
· Warthog
· Wisent
|
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





































